Same-Day Service Available 7 Days a Week*

Your Local Water Profile: Malibu

This profile explains what the applicable water provider reported for Malibu, what those results may mean throughout a home, and where property-specific testing or inspection may still be needed.

(877) 798-7487
A water provider's official report describes the public water system and its monitoring period — not every individual home. Plumbing materials, water age, temperature, and equipment can change water after it enters a property. Official report year: 2025.

Water provider: Los Angeles County Waterworks Districts

Public water system CA1910204 · 2025 report · Current 2025 monitoring cycle

View the 2025 Los Angeles County Waterworks Districts Consumer Confidence Report

What the official water report says

Your water at a glance

Los Angeles County Waterworks District 29

The report lists hardness as 234 ppm; this is very hard on the USGS scale.

USGS hardness scale: 0–60 soft; 61–120 moderately hard; 121–180 hard; >180 very hard, in mg/L as CaCO3.

Source: official report, p. 4

Los Angeles County Waterworks Districts — compliance, as reported

The report states: “We are proud to report that in 2025, your water met or surpassed all health-based drinking water standards. [p. 1]

Units used on this page: parts per million (ppm) — a concentration commonly corresponding to milligrams per liter in water; parts per billion (ppb) — a very small concentration commonly corresponding to micrograms per liter in water.

The Three C's — 1 of 3

Chemistry

What does this water tend to do in a home?

Copper

The utility reported: 0.10 ppm

LEAD AND COPPER · report p. 4 · official report

Lead

The utility reported: 0 ppb

LEAD AND COPPER · report p. 4 · official report

Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3

The utility reported: 110 ppm

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3

The utility reported: 98 ppm

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Calcium

The utility reported: 56 ppm

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Calcium

The utility reported: 32 ppm

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Hardness, Total as CaCO3

The utility reported: 234 ppm

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Hardness, Total as CaCO3

The utility reported: 140 ppm

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Magnesium

The utility reported: 22 ppm

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Magnesium

The utility reported: 14 ppm

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Sodium

The utility reported: 89 ppm

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Sodium

The utility reported: 48 ppm

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Chloride

The utility reported: 92 ppm

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Chloride

The utility reported: 49 ppm

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Sulfate

The utility reported: 176 ppm

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Sulfate

The utility reported: 71 ppm

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Total Dissolved Solids

The utility reported: 536 ppm

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Total Dissolved Solids

The utility reported: 297 ppm

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Chemistry is not a safety grade, and utility-level values do not guarantee conditions at a property.

The Three C's — 2 of 3

Contaminants

What was reported, and what do the applicable standards mean?

Legal limit — maximum contaminant level (MCL)

The highest level legally allowed in public drinking water under the applicable rule. Do not use MCL as a generic label for goals, action levels, notification levels, or independent guidelines. It is different from a non-enforceable health goal.

California health goal — public health goal (PHG)

A non-enforceable health-protective target developed for standard-setting context. It is not the California legal limit.

Federal health goal — maximum contaminant level goal (MCLG)

A non-enforceable EPA public-health target used in setting standards. It is not the legal limit.

Legal disinfectant-residual limit — maximum residual disinfectant level (MRDL)

The highest level of a drinking-water disinfectant allowed under the applicable rule. It is not an MCL for a contaminant.

Los Angeles County Waterworks Districts — regulated contaminants reported as detected (16)

Aluminum

The utility reported: 96 ppb

Reported range: ND - 100

Legal limit (MCL): 1000 · Health goal (PHG): 600 — not an enforceable limit

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Residue from water treatment process; runoff and leaching from natural deposits

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Aluminum

The utility reported: 60 ppb

Reported range: ND - 79

Legal limit (MCL): 1000 · Health goal (PHG): 600 — not an enforceable limit

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Residue from water treatment process; runoff and leaching from natural deposits

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Chlorine**

The utility reported: 1.5 ppm

Reported range: 1.4 - 1.6

MRDL: 4.0 as Cl2 · Health goal (MRDLG): 4 as Cl2 — not an enforceable limit

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Drinking water disinfectant added for treatment

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Chlorine**

The utility reported: 2.6 ppm

Reported range: 1.1 - 3.1

MRDL: 4.0 as Cl2 · Health goal (MRDLG): 4 as Cl2 — not an enforceable limit

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Drinking water disinfectant added for treatment

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Fluoride

The utility reported: 0.7 ppm

Reported range: 0.5 - 0.8

Legal limit (MCL): 2 · Health goal (PHG): 1 — not an enforceable limit

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Erosion of natural deposits; discharge from fertilizer and aluminum factories

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Fluoride

The utility reported: 0.7 ppm

Reported range: 0.6 - 0.8

Legal limit (MCL): 2 · Health goal (PHG): 1 — not an enforceable limit

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Erosion of natural deposits; discharge from fertilizer and aluminum factories

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Gross Beta

The utility reported: Not detected at the report's stated reporting limit pCi/L

Reported range: ND - 5

Legal limit (MCL): 50 · Health goal (MCLG): 0 — not an enforceable limit

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Decay of natural and man-made deposits

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Haloacetic Acids [HAA5]**

The utility reported: 5.3 ppb

Reported range: 3.8 - 5.7

Legal limit (MCL): 60

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Byproduct of drinking water disinfection

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Haloacetic Acids [HAA5]**

The utility reported: 3.1 ppb

Reported range: ND - 4.9

Legal limit (MCL): 60

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Byproduct of drinking water disinfection

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Haloacetic Acids [HAA5]**

The utility reported: 3.0 ppb

Reported range: ND - 2.9

Legal limit (MCL): 60

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Byproduct of drinking water disinfection

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Total Organic Carbon (TOC)

The utility reported: 2.5 ppm

Reported range: 1.6 - 2.8

TT: TT

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Various natural and man-made sources; TOC is a precursor for the formation of disinfection byproducts

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Total Organic Carbon (TOC)

The utility reported: 2.3 ppm

Reported range: 1.9 - 2.4

TT: TT

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Various natural and man-made sources; TOC is a precursor for the formation of disinfection byproducts

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Total Trihalomethanes [TTHMs]**

The utility reported: 19.0 ppb

Reported range: 10 - 31

Legal limit (MCL): 80

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Byproduct of drinking water disinfection

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Total Trihalomethanes [TTHMs]**

The utility reported: 31 ppb

Reported range: 24 - 30

Legal limit (MCL): 80

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Byproduct of drinking water disinfection

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Total Trihalomethanes [TTHMs]**

The utility reported: 14 ppb

Reported range: 10 - 17

Legal limit (MCL): 80

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Byproduct of drinking water disinfection

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Uranium

The utility reported: 2 pCi/L

Reported range: 2-3

Legal limit (MCL): 20 · Health goal (PHG): 0.43 — not an enforceable limit

Violation per report: No

Typical source, per the report: Erosion of natural deposits

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 3 · official report

Los Angeles County Waterworks Districts — unregulated monitoring and secondary (aesthetic) records (6)

Unregulated means monitored without an applicable enforceable legal limit (MCL) — it does not mean unimportant or illegal. Secondary records address aesthetic, cosmetic, or technical effects such as taste, odor, staining, or scale, and are not automatically primary health standards.

Aluminum

The utility reported: 96 ppb

Reported range: ND - 100

Typical source, per the report: Erosion of natural deposits; residue from some surface water treatment processes

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Aluminum

The utility reported: 60 ppb

Reported range: ND - 79

Typical source, per the report: Erosion of natural deposits; residue from some surface water treatment processes

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Specific Conductance

The utility reported: 868 µS/cm

Reported range: 754 - 981

Typical source, per the report: Runoff/leaching from natural deposits

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Specific Conductance

The utility reported: 504 µS/cm

Reported range: 503 - 504

Typical source, per the report: Runoff/leaching from natural deposits

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Potassium

The utility reported: 4.4 ppm

Reported range: 3.8 - 5

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Potassium

The utility reported: 2.8 ppm

Reported range: 2.8 - 2.9

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Detection, enforceable limits, health goals, advisory levels, and violations are different concepts.

The Three C's — 3 of 3

Corrosion

What conditions could influence pipes, fixtures, and a water heater?

Copper

The utility reported: 0.10 ppm

LEAD AND COPPER · report p. 4 · official report

Lead

The utility reported: 0 ppb

LEAD AND COPPER · report p. 4 · official report

Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3

The utility reported: 110 ppm

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3

The utility reported: 98 ppm

OTHER PARAMETERS · report p. 4 · official report

Chloride

The utility reported: 92 ppm

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Chloride

The utility reported: 49 ppm

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Sulfate

The utility reported: 176 ppm

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

Sulfate

The utility reported: 71 ppm

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS · report p. 4 · official report

This is system-level water-quality context, not a diagnosis of your home. Plumbing materials, water age, temperature, maintenance, and equipment design can materially change what happens at a specific property.

Whole-Home Relevance

What this may mean throughout your home

Local conditions can be relevant to equipment and fixtures — actual effects depend on your property.

Water heater (tank and tankless)

What the local report can tell us
The report's hardness and mineral values above are the system-level inputs most relevant to scale and sediment where water is heated.
What a homeowner may notice
Hardness minerals can contribute to scale on heating surfaces, sediment in tanks, and more frequent flushing or descaling needs.
What the report cannot tell us
Property-specific outcomes — actual effects depend on temperature, use, equipment design, installation, maintenance, and property plumbing.
Responsible next step
Inspect the actual water heater and plumbing when symptoms involve hot-water odor, scale, sediment, corrosion, flow, noise, or repeated service demand.

Dishwasher and washing machine

What the local report can tell us
Reported hardness and secondary (aesthetic) records are the relevant system-level context for spotting and residue.
What a homeowner may notice
Hard water can change soap behavior and may contribute to spotting on dishes and residue in laundry.
What the report cannot tell us
Property-specific outcomes — actual effects depend on temperature, use, equipment design, installation, maintenance, and property plumbing.
Responsible next step
Inspect the actual water heater and plumbing when symptoms involve hot-water odor, scale, sediment, corrosion, flow, noise, or repeated service demand.

Pipes, fixtures, faucets, and supply lines

What the local report can tell us
The corrosion-related inputs above (such as pH) describe the water entering the property — not the condition of any specific plumbing.
What a homeowner may notice
Mineral deposits can appear on aerators and fixtures; corrosion outcomes depend on materials, age, and water conditions together.
What the report cannot tell us
Property-specific outcomes — actual effects depend on temperature, use, equipment design, installation, maintenance, and property plumbing.
Responsible next step
Inspect the actual water heater and plumbing when symptoms involve hot-water odor, scale, sediment, corrosion, flow, noise, or repeated service demand.

Drinking and cooking water

What the local report can tell us
The contaminant records above show what the utility reported for the system and period, with each benchmark type labeled.
What a homeowner may notice
Taste, odor, or aesthetic preferences can be noticeable even when health-based standards are met.
What the report cannot tell us
Property-specific outcomes — actual effects depend on temperature, use, equipment design, installation, maintenance, and property plumbing.
Responsible next step
Inspect the actual water heater and plumbing when symptoms involve hot-water odor, scale, sediment, corrosion, flow, noise, or repeated service demand.

Decision Pathways

Treatment pathways to evaluate

Treatment is a decision pathway, not a product conclusion — no equipment can be responsibly chosen from city-level data alone.

The evaluation sequence we follow, in order:

  1. 1Define the concern
  2. 2Verify utility-level and home-specific evidence
  3. 3Choose point of treatment
  4. 4Verify the exact certified reduction claim for the exact model
  5. 5Review tradeoffs and maintenance

Water filtration

Objective it can address
Specific substances or aesthetic conditions (taste, odor, chlorine character).
Point of treatment
Point of entry or point of use, depending on the objective.
Limitations to verify
A filter works only for the conditions and reduction claims its exact design and certification support — filtration does not soften water.

Certification note: a standard number alone doesn't prove a product reduces every contaminant — the exact model's certified claim must match your objective.

Water softening

Objective it can address
Hardness minerals (calcium and magnesium) and the scale they can contribute to.
Point of treatment
Typically point of entry, confirmed by evaluation.
Limitations to verify
Softening primarily exchanges hardness minerals — it is not a universal contaminant-removal device.

Certification note: a standard number alone doesn't prove a product reduces every contaminant — the exact model's certified claim must match your objective.

Reverse osmosis

Objective it can address
Specified dissolved substances at a dedicated outlet, commonly drinking and cooking water.
Point of treatment
Typically point of use.
Limitations to verify
Produces a reject-water stream and needs pressure and maintenance; verify the exact NSF/ANSI 58 reduction claims for the exact model. It is not automatically the best system for every home.

Certification note: a standard number alone doesn't prove a product reduces every contaminant — the exact model's certified claim must match your objective.

When testing is the right next step

Use a certified laboratory when the concern is tap-specific, property-specific, or not resolved by the utility report.

When inspection is the right next step

Inspect the actual water heater and plumbing when symptoms involve hot-water odor, scale, sediment, corrosion, flow, noise, or repeated service demand.

Evidence You Can Check

Official reports, sources, and methodology

Official report — Los Angeles County Waterworks Districts

Consumer Confidence Report · data year 2025 · Current 2025 monitoring cycle

View the 2025 Los Angeles County Waterworks Districts Consumer Confidence Report

Source water, per the report: The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) supplies the District through West Basin Municipal Water. MWD supplies water from the Colorado River Aqueduct, which travels from Lake Havasu on the California-Arizona border to Lake Mathews near Riverside. The water is transported in the State Water Project’s California Aqueduct.

This is system-level water-quality context, not a diagnosis of your home. Plumbing materials, water age, temperature, maintenance, and equipment design can materially change what happens at a specific property.
The official utility report and controlling regulator determine compliance status. This page does not replace utility notices or regulator guidance.
Profile verified as of 2026-07-12 (framework v1.0). Values, units, ranges, periods, and compliance wording are preserved from each official report. Spot an error? Call (877) 798-7487 or use the contact form and we'll review it against the source report and correct it.

Property-Specific Next Step

Request a Water Quality Evaluation

Request a water-heater and water-quality evaluation tailored to the property, equipment, and homeowner objective.

A property-specific evaluation confirms your goals, provider, tap conditions, plumbing, equipment, installation, and maintenance before any treatment recommendation — this profile alone is never used to prescribe equipment.

THE Water Heater Company full team

Ready for hot water?

Water Heaters Are All We Do

Same-day water heater service across Los Angeles, Orange & Ventura counties — with water-quality context that respects the evidence.

(877) 798-7487