Your Local Water Profile: Villa Park
This profile explains what the applicable water provider reported for Villa Park, what those results may mean throughout a home, and where property-specific testing or inspection may still be needed.
Water provider: Serrano Water District
Public water system CA3010082 · 2024 report · 2024 data retained; monitor for the next official update
View the 2024 Serrano Water District Consumer Confidence ReportWhat the official water report says
Your water at a glance
Serrano Water District
The report lists hardness as 343 ppm as CaCO3; this is not classified because the reported unit could not be normalized on the USGS scale.
USGS hardness scale: 0–60 soft; 61–120 moderately hard; 121–180 hard; >180 very hard, in mg/L as CaCO3.
Serrano Water District — compliance, as reported
The report states: “Serrano Water District vigilantly safeguards its water supply, and, as in years past, the water delivered to your home meets the quality standards required by federal and state regulatory agencies.”
Violations or advisories, as reported: Lead was detected in 2 samples; both exceeded the regulatory action level; however, both locations were re-sampled, with the results showing lead was not detected in both re-samples. Serrano Water District found no lead service lines while performing the inventory.
The Three C's — 1 of 3
Chemistry
What does this water tend to do in a home?
Odor
The utility reported: 1 threshold odor number
distribution system · report p. PAGE 4 · official report
Turbidity
The utility reported: Not detected at the report's stated reporting limit ntu
distribution system · report p. PAGE 4 · official report
Specific Conductance
The utility reported: 977 µmho/cm
groundwater · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Alkalinity, total
The utility reported: 196 ppm as CaCO3
groundwater · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Hardness, total
The utility reported: 343 ppm as CaCO3
groundwater · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Color
The utility reported: Not detected at the report's stated reporting limit color units
surface water · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Specific Conductance
The utility reported: 767 µmho/cm
surface water · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Total Dissolved Solids
The utility reported: 483 ppm
surface water · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Total Alkalinity
The utility reported: 170 ppm as CaCO3
surface water · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Total Hardness
The utility reported: 333 ppm as CaCO3
surface water · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
The Three C's — 2 of 3
Contaminants
What was reported, and what do the applicable standards mean?
Legal limit — maximum contaminant level (MCL)
The highest level legally allowed in public drinking water under the applicable rule. Do not use MCL as a generic label for goals, action levels, notification levels, or independent guidelines. It is different from a non-enforceable health goal.
California health goal — public health goal (PHG)
A non-enforceable health-protective target developed for standard-setting context. It is not the California legal limit.
Federal health goal — maximum contaminant level goal (MCLG)
A non-enforceable EPA public-health target used in setting standards. It is not the legal limit.
Legal disinfectant-residual limit — maximum residual disinfectant level (MRDL)
The highest level of a drinking-water disinfectant allowed under the applicable rule. It is not an MCL for a contaminant.
Serrano Water District — regulated contaminants reported as detected (13)
Total Trihalomethanes
The utility reported: 27 ppb
Reported range: 13 - 28
Benchmark: 80
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Byproducts of Chlorine Disinfection
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 4 · official report
Haloacetic Acids
The utility reported: 13 ppb
Reported range: 1.9 - 12
Benchmark: 60
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Byproducts of Chlorine Disinfection
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 4 · official report
Chlorine Residual
The utility reported: 2 ppm
Reported range: 1.5 - 2.1
Benchmark: (4 / 4)
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Disinfectant Added for Treatment
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 4 · official report
Copper
The utility reported: 0.32 ppm
Benchmark: 1.3 · Health goal (goal): 0.3 — not an enforceable limit
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Corrosion of Household Plumbing
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 4 · official report
Lead
The utility reported: Not detected at the report's stated reporting limit ppb
Benchmark: 15 · Health goal (goal): 0.2 — not an enforceable limit
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Corrosion of Household Plumbing
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 4 · official report
Fluoride
The utility reported: 0.23 ppm
Reported range: 0.21 - 0.24
Benchmark: 2 · Health goal (goal): 1 — not an enforceable limit
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Nitrate
The utility reported: 1.07 ppm as N
Reported range: 0.8 - 1.44
Benchmark: 10 · Health goal (goal): 10 — not an enforceable limit
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Fertilizers, Septic Tanks
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Nitrate+Nitrite
The utility reported: 1.07 ppm as N
Reported range: 0.8 - 1.44
Benchmark: 10 · Health goal (goal): 10 — not an enforceable limit
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Fertilizers, Septic Tanks
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Combined Radium
The utility reported: 2.19 pCi/L
Reported range: 2.19
Benchmark: 5 · Health goal (goal): (0) — not an enforceable limit
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Uranium
The utility reported: 2.5 pCi/L
Reported range: 2.5
Benchmark: 20 · Health goal (goal): 0.43 — not an enforceable limit
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Aluminum Source
The utility reported: 0.086 ppm
Reported range: ND - 0.12
Benchmark: 1 · Health goal (goal): 0.6 — not an enforceable limit
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Aluminum Treated
The utility reported: 0.152 ppm
Reported range: 0.099 - 0.2
Benchmark: 1 · Health goal (goal): 0.6 — not an enforceable limit
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Treatment Process Residue
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Fluoride
The utility reported: 0.24 ppm
Reported range: 0.18- 0.29
Benchmark: 2 · Health goal (goal): 1 — not an enforceable limit
Violation per report: No
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Serrano Water District — unregulated monitoring and secondary (aesthetic) records (19)
Unregulated means monitored without an applicable enforceable legal limit (MCL) — it does not mean unimportant or illegal. Secondary records address aesthetic, cosmetic, or technical effects such as taste, odor, staining, or scale, and are not automatically primary health standards.
Iron
The utility reported: 25 ppb
Reported range: ND - 186
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Bicarbonate
The utility reported: 240 ppm as HCO3
Reported range: 230 - 249
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Boron
The utility reported: 0.17 ppm
Reported range: 0.16 - 0.17
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Perfluoro Butanoic Acid
The utility reported: 9 ppt
Reported range: 6.7 - 14
Typical source, per the report: Industrial Discharge
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Perfluoro Hexanoic Acid
The utility reported: Not detected at the report's stated reporting limit ppt
Reported range: ND - 6
Typical source, per the report: Industrial Discharge
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Perfluoro Pentanoic Acid
The utility reported: 14 ppt
Reported range: 9.6 - 22
Typical source, per the report: Industrial Discharge
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Potassium
The utility reported: 1.7 ppm
Reported range: 1.7 - 1.8
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Lithium
The utility reported: 21 ppb
Reported range: 19 - 23
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Perfluoro Butanoic Acid
The utility reported: 9.3 ppt
Reported range: 7.4 - 11
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Perfluoro Pentanoic Acid
The utility reported: 14 ppt
Reported range: 11 - 16
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Aluminum Treated
The utility reported: 152 ppb
Reported range: 99 - 200
Typical source, per the report: Treatment Process Residue
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Iron
The utility reported: 163 ppb
Reported range: ND - 260
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Manganese Source
The utility reported: 148 ppb
Reported range: 25 - 800
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Manganese Treated
The utility reported: 10 ppb
Reported range: ND - 140
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Bicarbonate
The utility reported: 207 ppm
Reported range: 200 - 220
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Boron
The utility reported: 0.12 ppm
Reported range: 0.11 - 0.13
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Potassium
The utility reported: 2.5 ppm
Reported range: 2.3 - 2.7
Typical source, per the report: Erosion of Natural Deposits
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Lithium
The utility reported: 25 ppb
Reported range: 24 - 27
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Perfluoro Pentanoic Acid
The utility reported: Not detected at the report's stated reporting limit ppt
Reported range: ND - 3.9
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
The Three C's — 3 of 3
Corrosion
What conditions could influence pipes, fixtures, and a water heater?
Alkalinity, total
The utility reported: 196 ppm as CaCO3
groundwater · report p. PAGE 5 · official report
Total Alkalinity
The utility reported: 170 ppm as CaCO3
surface water · report p. PAGE 6 · official report
Copper
The utility reported: 0.32 ppm
Typical source, per the report: Corrosion of Household Plumbing
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 4 · official report
Lead
The utility reported: Not detected at the report's stated reporting limit ppb
Typical source, per the report: Corrosion of Household Plumbing
Reported constituent · report p. PAGE 4 · official report
Whole-Home Relevance
What this may mean throughout your home
Local conditions can be relevant to equipment and fixtures — actual effects depend on your property.
Water heater (tank and tankless)
- What the local report can tell us
- The report's hardness and mineral values above are the system-level inputs most relevant to scale and sediment where water is heated.
- What a homeowner may notice
- Hardness minerals can contribute to scale on heating surfaces, sediment in tanks, and more frequent flushing or descaling needs.
- What the report cannot tell us
- Property-specific outcomes — actual effects depend on temperature, use, equipment design, installation, maintenance, and property plumbing.
- Responsible next step
- Inspect the actual water heater and plumbing when symptoms involve hot-water odor, scale, sediment, corrosion, flow, noise, or repeated service demand.
Dishwasher and washing machine
- What the local report can tell us
- Reported hardness and secondary (aesthetic) records are the relevant system-level context for spotting and residue.
- What a homeowner may notice
- Hard water can change soap behavior and may contribute to spotting on dishes and residue in laundry.
- What the report cannot tell us
- Property-specific outcomes — actual effects depend on temperature, use, equipment design, installation, maintenance, and property plumbing.
- Responsible next step
- Inspect the actual water heater and plumbing when symptoms involve hot-water odor, scale, sediment, corrosion, flow, noise, or repeated service demand.
Pipes, fixtures, faucets, and supply lines
- What the local report can tell us
- The corrosion-related inputs above (such as pH) describe the water entering the property — not the condition of any specific plumbing.
- What a homeowner may notice
- Mineral deposits can appear on aerators and fixtures; corrosion outcomes depend on materials, age, and water conditions together.
- What the report cannot tell us
- Property-specific outcomes — actual effects depend on temperature, use, equipment design, installation, maintenance, and property plumbing.
- Responsible next step
- Inspect the actual water heater and plumbing when symptoms involve hot-water odor, scale, sediment, corrosion, flow, noise, or repeated service demand.
Drinking and cooking water
- What the local report can tell us
- The contaminant records above show what the utility reported for the system and period, with each benchmark type labeled.
- What a homeowner may notice
- Taste, odor, or aesthetic preferences can be noticeable even when health-based standards are met.
- What the report cannot tell us
- Property-specific outcomes — actual effects depend on temperature, use, equipment design, installation, maintenance, and property plumbing.
- Responsible next step
- Inspect the actual water heater and plumbing when symptoms involve hot-water odor, scale, sediment, corrosion, flow, noise, or repeated service demand.
Decision Pathways
Treatment pathways to evaluate
Treatment is a decision pathway, not a product conclusion — no equipment can be responsibly chosen from city-level data alone.
The evaluation sequence we follow, in order:
- 1Define the concern
- 2Verify utility-level and home-specific evidence
- 3Choose point of treatment
- 4Verify the exact certified reduction claim for the exact model
- 5Review tradeoffs and maintenance
Water filtration
- Objective it can address
- Specific substances or aesthetic conditions (taste, odor, chlorine character).
- Point of treatment
- Point of entry or point of use, depending on the objective.
- Limitations to verify
- A filter works only for the conditions and reduction claims its exact design and certification support — filtration does not soften water.
Certification note: a standard number alone doesn't prove a product reduces every contaminant — the exact model's certified claim must match your objective.
Water softening
- Objective it can address
- Hardness minerals (calcium and magnesium) and the scale they can contribute to.
- Point of treatment
- Typically point of entry, confirmed by evaluation.
- Limitations to verify
- Softening primarily exchanges hardness minerals — it is not a universal contaminant-removal device.
Certification note: a standard number alone doesn't prove a product reduces every contaminant — the exact model's certified claim must match your objective.
Reverse osmosis
- Objective it can address
- Specified dissolved substances at a dedicated outlet, commonly drinking and cooking water.
- Point of treatment
- Typically point of use.
- Limitations to verify
- Produces a reject-water stream and needs pressure and maintenance; verify the exact NSF/ANSI 58 reduction claims for the exact model. It is not automatically the best system for every home.
Certification note: a standard number alone doesn't prove a product reduces every contaminant — the exact model's certified claim must match your objective.
When testing is the right next step
Use a certified laboratory when the concern is tap-specific, property-specific, or not resolved by the utility report.
When inspection is the right next step
Inspect the actual water heater and plumbing when symptoms involve hot-water odor, scale, sediment, corrosion, flow, noise, or repeated service demand.
Evidence You Can Check
Official reports, sources, and methodology
Official report — Serrano Water District
2025 Water Quality Report · data year 2024 · 2024 data retained; monitor for the next official update
View the 2024 Serrano Water District Consumer Confidence ReportSource water, per the report: Your drinking water is a blend of local native surface water and imported MWDSC water impounded within Santiago Reservoir. Additionally, groundwater is pumped from the local aquifer managed by OCWD that stretches from the Prado Dam and fans across the northwestern portion of Orange County.
Nearby community water profiles
Property-Specific Next Step
Request a Water Quality Evaluation
Request a water-heater and water-quality evaluation tailored to the property, equipment, and homeowner objective.
A property-specific evaluation confirms your goals, provider, tap conditions, plumbing, equipment, installation, and maintenance before any treatment recommendation — this profile alone is never used to prescribe equipment.
Ready for hot water?
Water Heaters Are All We Do
Same-day water heater service across Los Angeles, Orange & Ventura counties — with water-quality context that respects the evidence.
